I'd like to discuss trucks now. Here's my main "ranch truck", a '97 Ford F250 Super Heavy Duty 4WD:
|Hard at work!|
We bought this truck new in '97 and for the first 10 years, I hated the thing. It was rough and bouncy and just a very unpleasant thing to drive. Then in '08, when my mother and I took over the ranch, one of the first things we bought was a flat-bed for the Ford. I tell you what.... that _totally_ transformed this truck. It's still rough and bouncy, but not quite so much. The main thing, though, is that the truck is 100% more useful. No more climbing over the bed to get to stuff. I can arrange my tools and supplies all around the bed and get to them, easily. I can even load an ATV up the side of the truck while I have trailer on the back. It has a stout bumper hitch and built-in gooseneck. While putting the flat-bed itself on, I had trailer brakes installed and now, finally, we have a real working ranch truck.
|From the rear|
|We're in full Fencing Mode here|
|Behind the seat- more junk!|
I will say one good thing about this Ford- it's been very reliable. It has 95,000 ranch road miles on it and the only issues I've had have been a failed water pump. We replaced the front end steering stuff several years ago and I've done brakes once. The driver's side door internals are loose and there's a crack developing under the "truck window". That's it. That's really pretty impressive for a truck that gets pounded around like this one. The CEO asked if we were ready to replace the truck, but really, it's well suited for the job now, I know it, and it's reliable so I voted to keep it awhile longer.
|1987 Suzuki Samurai|
|Just too narrow!|
After sinking $1500 in suspension, exhaust, fuel pump, tires, and misc I finally came to the conclusion that the Toyota blew this thing away. The main problem with the Suzuki was that it was just too narrow. Our ranch roads are worn by decades of Ford F250's and the 'zuki just didn't fit in the ruts. Consequently, I had to straddle the ruts and that was just ultra-rough. The Toyota is wide enough to almost fit in the ruts and, being a long bed, is just inherently smoother. The Suzuki has a 1300 cc engine while the Toyota has a 2200 cc engine. The Suzuki has NO torque; the Toyota will actually pull trailers. The Suzuki was noisy and rattling; the Toyota is surprisingly quiet. Then I did the math. If I drove the Suzuki 5,000 miles/year, I'd save about $300 in gas. Any repairs, of course, would eat into that savings and with the engine developing an oil leak, I just wasn't confident in the little truck. So, with some regrets, I sold the Suzuki and went back to driving the Toyota.
The vehicle sitting next to the Toyota is a 1999 Suburban that I bought in 2003 as our family was starting to expand. It had a 42,000 miles when I bought it and it now has 196,000 miles. It has not been trouble free, though. It's gone thru 2 fuel pumps ($800 each to replace), a head gasket repair (I fixed that- it took 3 days), and, finally, the transmission ($3500). It's still cheaper than a new vehicle, though. On the upside, it can handle our dirt roads, gets 18-19 mpg on the highway, has a ton of room, is comfortable to drive, and can pull a house. Having done the transmission, I think we're going to keep driving it until it drops. At worst, I can convert it to a hawking vehicle or something. On the whole, we've driven this Suburban longer than any vehicle we've owned.
And now for David...David's been on steroids (prednisolone) and we've adjusted his dosage up and down to find the point at which his blood drops and rises. We've been to Denver to investigate a bone marrow transplant. We still don't have a solid diagnosis on his disease but the most recent development is that his and our blood has been sent to Italy to a world specialist on his suspected disease (congenital dyserythropoietic anemia, or CDA). Because the steroids are keeping his blood up, the UNM docs wanted to try a transfusion to see if that would a) get his blood levels up even more, b) thereby reducing the size of his huge spleen. We did that last Friday and when we checked his blood on Tues, his hemoglobin was up to an astonishing 11.2 g/dL. Remember that it's normally 4.0 and the highest it's ever gotten with steroids is 9.0-ish. We were really happy to see this increase and hope that it a) stays there, b) reduces the size of his spleen.
Here's an interesting story. Early in the week we got news that the docs wanted to send our blood to Italy. We talked about it. That Weds in Bible study we were finishing up a multi-month study of Hebrews and the next to last verse says "Those from Italy greet you." We liked that.
Well, that's it for this month. See you in June.